Enterprises are increasingly turning to global capability centers (GCCs) for more than just cost efficiency. Once regarded predominantly as a collection of back-office service providers, GCCs have evolved into key contributors of innovation, transformation and substantive value. According to ISG Research, nearly a quarter of enterprises are contemplating the establishment of a new GCC in the next 18 months – and 40% aim to expand their existing operations.
But – while demand is on the rise – GCCs that lack strategic oversight can fail to meet expected outcomes. Only 36% of enterprises that have set up or significantly changed their GCCs in the last two years see significant improvement in quality of operations.
Why do so many GCCs fail to meet expected outcomes?
Here are some common reasons that GCCs don’t always live up to expectations:
Establishing a GCC requires a significant investment in time and money. To see a return on that investment, strategic oversight is imperative. A strategy realization office (SRO) is vital to making sure a GCC achieves its goals.
An SRO serves as a bridge between enterprise leadership, business units and vendors to ensure a seamless partnership, as outlined in Figure 1 below. The enterprise makes pivotal decisions concerning scope, budget and timelines, while a multi-vendor framework delivers services per contractual obligations. The SRO operates closely with the enterprise leadership to align strategic objectives and ensure the GCC delivers quantifiable value. At the same time, the SRO collaborates with vendors and delivery partners to ensure compliance with contractual agreements and ensure timely and budget-conscious delivery of the defined scope.
Through effective steering, performance tracking and quality assurance, the SRO guarantees that the GCC is established with the best chances of success, achieves desired business outcomes and maintains stakeholder alignment.
Please fill out this form to continue.